m i c r o b a t d y n a m o
  • January 10th
    21 notes
    Source
    sugaratoms:

ANU scientists have successfully bent light beams around an object on a two dimensional metal surface, opening the door to faster and cheaper computer chips working with light.The international team, including three members from the Research School of Physics and Engineering at ANU, have successfully demonstrated that a tiny beam of light on a flat surface can be bent around an obstacle, and course-correct itself on the other side of that obstacle. It’s the world’s first two-dimensional demonstration of so-called ‘Airy beams’. Their paper on the subject will be published in this month’s Physical Review Letters.“Students in science class learn that light rays travel along straight trajectories and that it can’t go around corners,” said ANU team member Professor Yuri Kivshar.“Recently it was discovered that small beams of light can be bent in a laboratory setting, diffracting much less than a regular beam. These rays of light are called ‘Airy Beams,’ and named after the English astronomer Sir George Biddell Airy, who studied light in rainbows.“Our team has demonstrated that these beams can also be bound on the flat surface of a chip. We also observed a fascinating property of these beams – the so-called self-healing phenomenon, where the wave recovers after passing through surface defects,” he said.Fellow ANU team member Dr Dragomir Neshev says that this demonstration offers potential in a number of areas.“This discovery offers some exciting possible applications, particularly in the area of communications technology where it could allow us a cheap way to manipulate light on a chip,” he said.
sugaratoms:

ANU scientists have successfully bent light beams around an object on a two dimensional metal surface, opening the door to faster and cheaper computer chips working with light.The international team, including three members from the Research School of Physics and Engineering at ANU, have successfully demonstrated that a tiny beam of light on a flat surface can be bent around an obstacle, and course-correct itself on the other side of that obstacle. It’s the world’s first two-dimensional demonstration of so-called ‘Airy beams’. Their paper on the subject will be published in this month’s Physical Review Letters.“Students in science class learn that light rays travel along straight trajectories and that it can’t go around corners,” said ANU team member Professor Yuri Kivshar.“Recently it was discovered that small beams of light can be bent in a laboratory setting, diffracting much less than a regular beam. These rays of light are called ‘Airy Beams,’ and named after the English astronomer Sir George Biddell Airy, who studied light in rainbows.“Our team has demonstrated that these beams can also be bound on the flat surface of a chip. We also observed a fascinating property of these beams – the so-called self-healing phenomenon, where the wave recovers after passing through surface defects,” he said.Fellow ANU team member Dr Dragomir Neshev says that this demonstration offers potential in a number of areas.“This discovery offers some exciting possible applications, particularly in the area of communications technology where it could allow us a cheap way to manipulate light on a chip,” he said.

    sugaratoms:

    ANU scientists have successfully bent light beams around an object on a two dimensional metal surface, opening the door to faster and cheaper computer chips working with light.

    The international team, including three members from the Research School of Physics and Engineering at ANU, have successfully demonstrated that a tiny beam of light on a flat surface can be bent around an obstacle, and course-correct itself on the other side of that obstacle. It’s the world’s first two-dimensional demonstration of so-called ‘Airy beams’. Their paper on the subject will be published in this month’s Physical Review Letters.

    “Students in science class learn that light rays travel along straight trajectories and that it can’t go around corners,” said ANU team member Professor Yuri Kivshar.

    “Recently it was discovered that small beams of light can be bent in a laboratory setting, diffracting much less than a regular beam. These rays of light are called ‘Airy Beams,’ and named after the English astronomer Sir George Biddell Airy, who studied light in rainbows.

    “Our team has demonstrated that these beams can also be bound on the flat surface of a chip. We also observed a fascinating property of these beams – the so-called self-healing phenomenon, where the wave recovers after passing through surface defects,” he said.

    Fellow ANU team member Dr Dragomir Neshev says that this demonstration offers potential in a number of areas.

    “This discovery offers some exciting possible applications, particularly in the area of communications technology where it could allow us a cheap way to manipulate light on a chip,” he said.

  • October 3rd
    126 notes
    Source

    'Light-speed' neutrinos point to new physical reality

    metaconscious:

    [This New Scientist article is only available to subscribers so it has been presented in its entirety.]

    SUBATOMIC particles have broken the universe’s fundamental speed limit, or so it was reported last week. The speed of light is the ultimate limit on travel in the universe, and the basis for Einstein’s special theory of relativity, so if the finding stands up to scrutiny, does it spell the end for physics as we know it? The reality is less simplistic and far more interesting.

    “People were saying this means Einstein is wrong,” says physicist Heinrich Päs of the Technical University of Dortmund in Germany. “But that’s not really correct.”

    Instead, the result could be the first evidence for a reality built out of extra dimensions. Future historians of science may regard it not as the moment we abandoned Einstein and broke physics, but rather as the point at which our view of space vastly expanded, from three dimensions to four, or more.

    “This may be a physics revolution,” says Thomas Weiler at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee, who has devised theories built on extra dimensions. “The famous words ‘paradigm shift’ are used too often and tritely, but they might be relevant.”

    The subatomic particles - neutrinos - seem to have zipped faster than light from CERN, near Geneva, Switzerland, to the OPERA detector at the Gran Sasso lab near L’Aquila, Italy. It’s a conceptually simple result: neutrinos making the 730-kilometre journey arrived 60 nanoseconds earlier than they would have if they were travelling at light speed. And it relies on three seemingly simple measurements, says Dario Autiero of the Institute of Nuclear Physics in Lyon, France, a member of the OPERA collaboration: the distance between the labs, the time the neutrinos left CERN, and the time they arrived at Gran Sasso.

    But actually measuring those times and distances to the accuracy needed to detect nanosecond differences is no easy task. The OPERA collaboration spent three years chasing down every source of error they could imagine (see illustration) before Autiero made the result public in a seminar at CERN on 23 September.

    Physicists grilled Autiero for an hour after his talk to ensure the team had considered details like the curvature of the Earth, the tidal effects of the moon and the general relativistic effects of having two clocks at different heights (gravity slows time so a clock closer to Earth’s surface runs a tiny bit slower).

    They were impressed. “I want to congratulate you on this extremely beautiful experiment,” said Nobel laureate Samuel Ting of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology after Autiero’s talk. “The experiment is very carefully done, and the systematic error carefully checked.”

    Most physicists still expect some sort of experimental error to crop up and explain the anomaly, mainly because it contravenes the incredibly successful law of special relativity which holds that the speed of light is a constant that no object can exceed. The theory also leads to the famous equation E = mc2.

    Hotly anticipated are results from other neutrino detectors, including T2K in Japan and MINOS at Fermilab in Illinois, which will run similar experiments and confirm the results or rule them out (see “Fermilab stops hunting Higgs, starts neutrino quest”).

    In 2007, the MINOS experiment searched for faster-than-light neutrinos but didn’t see anything statistically significant. The team plans to reanalyse its data and upgrade the detector’s stopwatch. “These are the kind of things that we have to follow through, and make sure that our prejudices don’t get in the way of discovering something truly fantastic,” says Stephen Parke of Fermilab.

    In the meantime, suggests Sandip Pakvasa of the University of Hawaii, let’s suppose the OPERA result is real. If the experiment is tested and replicated and the only explanation is faster-than-light neutrinos, is E = mc2 done for?

    Not necessarily. In 2006, Pakvasa, Päs and Weiler came up with a model that allows certain particles to break the cosmic speed limit while leaving special relativity intact. “One can, if not rescue Einstein, at least leave him valid,” Weiler says.

    The trick is to send neutrinos on a shortcut through a fourth, thus-far-unobserved dimension of space, reducing the distance they have to travel. Then the neutrinos wouldn’t have to outstrip light to reach their destination in the observed time.

    In such a universe, the particles and forces we are familiar with are anchored to a four-dimensional membrane, or “brane”, with three dimensions of space and one of time. Crucially, the brane floats in a higher dimensional space-time called the bulk, which we are normally completely oblivious to.

    The fantastic success of special relativity up to now, plus other cosmological observations, have led physicists to think that the brane might be flat, like a sheet of paper. Quantum fluctuations could make it ripple and roll like the surface of the ocean, Weiler says. Then, if neutrinos can break free of the brane, they might get from one point on it to another by dashing through the bulk, like a flying fish taking a shortcut between the waves (see illustration).

    This model is attractive because it offers a way out of one of the biggest theoretical problems posed by the OPERA result: busting the apparent speed limit set by neutrinos detected pouring from a supernova in 1987.

    As stars explode in a supernova, most of their energy streams out as neutrinos. These particles hardly ever interact with matter. That means they should escape the star almost immediately, while photons of light will take about 3 hours. In 1987, trillions of neutrinos arrived at Earth 3 hours before the dying star’s light caught up. If the neutrinos were travelling as fast as those going from CERN to OPERA, they should have arrived in 1982.

    OPERA’s neutrinos were about 1000 times as energetic as the supernova’s neutrinos, though. And Pakvasa and colleagues’ model calls for neutrinos with a specific energy that makes them prefer tunnelling through the bulk to travelling along the brane. If that energy is around 20 gigaelectronvolts - and the team don’t yet know that it is - “then you expect large effects in the OPERA region, and small effects at the supernova energies,” Pakvasa says. He and Päs are meeting next week to work out the details.

    The flying fish shortcut isn’t available to all particles. In the language of string theory, a mathematical model some physicists hope will lead to a comprehensive “theory of everything”, most particles are represented by tiny vibrating strings whose ends are permanently stuck to the brane. One of the only exceptions is the theoretical “sterile neutrino”, represented by a closed loop of string. These are also the only type of neutrino thought capable of escaping the brane.

    Neutrinos are known to switch back and forth between their three observed types (electron, muon and tau neutrinos), and OPERA was originally designed to detect these shifts. In Pakvasa’s model, the muon neutrinos produced at CERN could have transformed to sterile neutrinos mid-flight, made a short hop through the bulk, and then switched back to muon before reappearing on the brane.

    So if OPERA’s results hold up, they could provide support for the existence of sterile neutrinos, extra dimensions and perhaps string theory. Such theories could also explain why gravity is so weak compared with the other fundamental forces. The theoretical particles that mediate gravity, known as gravitons, may also be closed loops of string that leak off into the bulk. “If, in the end, nobody sees anything wrong and other people reproduce OPERA’s results, then I think it’s evidence for string theory, in that string theory is what makes extra dimensions credible in the first place,” Weiler says.

    Meanwhile, alternative theories are likely to abound. Weiler expects papers to appear in a matter of days or weeks.

    Even if relativity is pushed aside, Einstein has worked so well for so long that he will never really go away. At worst, relativity will turn out to work for most of the universe but not all, just as Newton’s mechanics work until things get extremely large or small. “The fact that Einstein has worked for 106 years means he’ll always be there, either as the right answer or a low-energy effective theory,” Weiler says.

    (via New Scientist)

    Related reading » Neutrinos: Everything you need to know

    (via section5)

  • August 30th
    264 notes
    Source
    fuckyeahneuroscience:

Neurons: Animated Cellular and Molecular Concepts
This is a really great illustrated (free!) online textbook of sorts that describes the basic neuron, from its anatomy to ion channels and neurotransmitter activity. The 8 chapters listed are:
Anatomy of a Neuron
Axonal Transport
Ions and Ion Channels
Resting Membrane Potential
Action Potential
Neurotransmitter Release
Postsynaptic Mechanisms
Removal of Neurotransmitter
Each section has illustrations and diagrams to help supplement your studies! Whether you want to start your foundation in neuroscience or give it a small refresher, definitely bookmark this resource.
fuckyeahneuroscience:

Neurons: Animated Cellular and Molecular Concepts
This is a really great illustrated (free!) online textbook of sorts that describes the basic neuron, from its anatomy to ion channels and neurotransmitter activity. The 8 chapters listed are:
Anatomy of a Neuron
Axonal Transport
Ions and Ion Channels
Resting Membrane Potential
Action Potential
Neurotransmitter Release
Postsynaptic Mechanisms
Removal of Neurotransmitter
Each section has illustrations and diagrams to help supplement your studies! Whether you want to start your foundation in neuroscience or give it a small refresher, definitely bookmark this resource.

    fuckyeahneuroscience:

    Neurons: Animated Cellular and Molecular Concepts

    This is a really great illustrated (free!) online textbook of sorts that describes the basic neuron, from its anatomy to ion channels and neurotransmitter activity. The 8 chapters listed are:

    • Anatomy of a Neuron
    • Axonal Transport
    • Ions and Ion Channels
    • Resting Membrane Potential
    • Action Potential
    • Neurotransmitter Release
    • Postsynaptic Mechanisms
    • Removal of Neurotransmitter

    Each section has illustrations and diagrams to help supplement your studies! Whether you want to start your foundation in neuroscience or give it a small refresher, definitely bookmark this resource.

    (via section5)

  • July 29th
    72 notes
    Source

    Beyond the Inclined Plane: Websites that explain and apply physics.

    scienceisbeauty:

    What is science?, What can be done with science?, Why study physics?… Websites that illustrate physics. Internet teaching tools and classroom examples of everyday physics from biology, geology, homes, and factories. Links to video clips, applets, and animations that help teach physics in the classroom.

    In short, an excellent resource center. Do not miss it.

  • July 26th
    301 notes
    Source
    scienceisbeauty:

On May 19th, 2005, NASA’s Mars Exploration Rover Spirit captured this stunning view as the Sun sank below the rim of Gusev crater on Mars. This Panoramic Camera (Pancam) mosaic was taken around 6:07 in the evening of the rover’s 489th martian day, or sol. Spirit was commanded to stay awake briefly after sending that sol’s data to the Mars Odyssey orbiter just before sunset. This small panorama of the western sky was obtained using Pancam’s 750-nanometer, 530-nanometer and 430-nanometer color filters. This filter combination allows false color images to be generated that are similar to what a human would see, but with the colors slightly exaggerated.
Image credit: NASA/JPL/Texas A&M/Cornell
Source: A Moment Frozen in Time, Mars Exploration Rover Mission, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
scienceisbeauty:

On May 19th, 2005, NASA’s Mars Exploration Rover Spirit captured this stunning view as the Sun sank below the rim of Gusev crater on Mars. This Panoramic Camera (Pancam) mosaic was taken around 6:07 in the evening of the rover’s 489th martian day, or sol. Spirit was commanded to stay awake briefly after sending that sol’s data to the Mars Odyssey orbiter just before sunset. This small panorama of the western sky was obtained using Pancam’s 750-nanometer, 530-nanometer and 430-nanometer color filters. This filter combination allows false color images to be generated that are similar to what a human would see, but with the colors slightly exaggerated.
Image credit: NASA/JPL/Texas A&M/Cornell
Source: A Moment Frozen in Time, Mars Exploration Rover Mission, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    scienceisbeauty:

    On May 19th, 2005, NASA’s Mars Exploration Rover Spirit captured this stunning view as the Sun sank below the rim of Gusev crater on Mars. This Panoramic Camera (Pancam) mosaic was taken around 6:07 in the evening of the rover’s 489th martian day, or sol. Spirit was commanded to stay awake briefly after sending that sol’s data to the Mars Odyssey orbiter just before sunset. This small panorama of the western sky was obtained using Pancam’s 750-nanometer, 530-nanometer and 430-nanometer color filters. This filter combination allows false color images to be generated that are similar to what a human would see, but with the colors slightly exaggerated.

    Image credit: NASA/JPL/Texas A&M/Cornell

    Source: A Moment Frozen in Time, Mars Exploration Rover Mission, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory

  • July 25th
    20 notes
    Source
    sugaratoms:

A scanning electron micrograph of the tapering top of a weevil’s leg shows a curved ridge that functions like the thread on a biological screw, another mechanical marvel that evolved long before humans invented it.
sugaratoms:

A scanning electron micrograph of the tapering top of a weevil’s leg shows a curved ridge that functions like the thread on a biological screw, another mechanical marvel that evolved long before humans invented it.

    sugaratoms:

    A scanning electron micrograph of the tapering top of a weevil’s leg shows a curved ridge that functions like the thread on a biological screw, another mechanical marvel that evolved long before humans invented it.

  • July 8th
    19 notes
    Comparative Planetology: An Interview with Kim Stanley Robinson

BLDGBLOG: Aestheticizing these sorts of disasters can also have the effect of making climate change sound like an adventure. In Fifty Degrees Below, for instance, you wrote: “People are already fond of the flood… It was an adventure. It got people out of their ruts.” The implication is that people might actually be excited about climate change. Is there a risk that all these reports about flooded cities and lost archipelagoes and new coastlines might actually make climate change sound like some sort of survivalist adventure?Robinson: It’s a failure of imagination to think that climate change is going to be an escape from jail – and it’s a failure in a couple of ways.For one thing, modern civilization, with six billion people on the planet, lives on the tip of a gigantic complex of prosthetic devices – and all those devices have to work. The crash scenario that people think of, in this case, as an escape to freedom would actually be so damaging that it wouldn’t be fun. It wouldn’t be an adventure. It would merely be a struggle for food and security, and a permanent high risk of being robbed, beaten, or killed; your ability to feel confident about your own – and your family’s and your children’s – safety would be gone. People who fail to realize that… I’d say their imaginations haven’t fully gotten into this scenario.It’s easy to imagine people who are bored in the modern techno-surround, as I call it, and they’re bored because they have not fully comprehended that they’re still primates, that their brains grew over a million-year period doing a certain suite of activities, and those activities are still available. Anyone can do them; they’re simple. They have to do with basic life support and basic social activities unboosted by technological means.And there’s an addictive side to this. People try to do stupid technological replacements for natural primate actions, but it doesn’t quite give them the buzz that they hoped it would. Even though it looks quite magical, the sense of accomplishment is not there. So they do it again, hoping that the activity, like a drug, will somehow satisfy the urge that it’s supposedly meant to satisfy. But it doesn’t. So they do it more and more – and they fall down a rabbit hole, pursuing a destructive and high carbon-burn activity, when they could just go out for a walk, or plant a garden, or sit down at a table with a friend and drink some coffee and talk for an hour. All of these unboosted, straight-forward primate activities are actually intensely satisfying to the totality of the mind-body that we are.So a little bit of analysis of what we are as primates – how we got here evolutionarily, and what can satisfy us in this world – would help us to imagine activities that are much lower impact on the planet and much more satisfying to the individual at the same time. In general, I’ve been thinking: let’s rate our technologies for how much they help us as primates, rather than how they can put us further into this dream of being powerful gods who stalk around on a planet that doesn’t really matter to us.Because a lot of these supposed pleasures are really expensive. You pay with your life. You pay with your health. And they don’t satisfy you anyway! You end up taking various kinds of prescription or non-prescription drugs to compensate for your unhappiness and your unhealthiness – and the whole thing comes out of a kind of spiral: if only you could consume more, you’d be happier. But it isn’t true.I’m advocating a kind of alteration of our imagined relationship to the planet. I think it’d be more fun – and also more sustainable. We’re always thinking that we’re much more powerful than we are, because we’re boosted by technological powers that exert a really, really high cost on the environment – a cost that isn’t calculated and that isn’t put into the price of things. It’s exteriorized from our fake economy. And it’s very profitable for certain elements in our society for us to continue to wander around in this dream-state and be upset about everything.The hope that, “Oh, if only civilization were to collapse, then I could be happy” – it’s ridiculous. You can simply walk out your front door and get what you want out of that particular fantasy.

(via BLDGBLOG) Comparative Planetology: An Interview with Kim Stanley Robinson

BLDGBLOG: Aestheticizing these sorts of disasters can also have the effect of making climate change sound like an adventure. In Fifty Degrees Below, for instance, you wrote: “People are already fond of the flood… It was an adventure. It got people out of their ruts.” The implication is that people might actually be excited about climate change. Is there a risk that all these reports about flooded cities and lost archipelagoes and new coastlines might actually make climate change sound like some sort of survivalist adventure?Robinson: It’s a failure of imagination to think that climate change is going to be an escape from jail – and it’s a failure in a couple of ways.For one thing, modern civilization, with six billion people on the planet, lives on the tip of a gigantic complex of prosthetic devices – and all those devices have to work. The crash scenario that people think of, in this case, as an escape to freedom would actually be so damaging that it wouldn’t be fun. It wouldn’t be an adventure. It would merely be a struggle for food and security, and a permanent high risk of being robbed, beaten, or killed; your ability to feel confident about your own – and your family’s and your children’s – safety would be gone. People who fail to realize that… I’d say their imaginations haven’t fully gotten into this scenario.It’s easy to imagine people who are bored in the modern techno-surround, as I call it, and they’re bored because they have not fully comprehended that they’re still primates, that their brains grew over a million-year period doing a certain suite of activities, and those activities are still available. Anyone can do them; they’re simple. They have to do with basic life support and basic social activities unboosted by technological means.And there’s an addictive side to this. People try to do stupid technological replacements for natural primate actions, but it doesn’t quite give them the buzz that they hoped it would. Even though it looks quite magical, the sense of accomplishment is not there. So they do it again, hoping that the activity, like a drug, will somehow satisfy the urge that it’s supposedly meant to satisfy. But it doesn’t. So they do it more and more – and they fall down a rabbit hole, pursuing a destructive and high carbon-burn activity, when they could just go out for a walk, or plant a garden, or sit down at a table with a friend and drink some coffee and talk for an hour. All of these unboosted, straight-forward primate activities are actually intensely satisfying to the totality of the mind-body that we are.So a little bit of analysis of what we are as primates – how we got here evolutionarily, and what can satisfy us in this world – would help us to imagine activities that are much lower impact on the planet and much more satisfying to the individual at the same time. In general, I’ve been thinking: let’s rate our technologies for how much they help us as primates, rather than how they can put us further into this dream of being powerful gods who stalk around on a planet that doesn’t really matter to us.Because a lot of these supposed pleasures are really expensive. You pay with your life. You pay with your health. And they don’t satisfy you anyway! You end up taking various kinds of prescription or non-prescription drugs to compensate for your unhappiness and your unhealthiness – and the whole thing comes out of a kind of spiral: if only you could consume more, you’d be happier. But it isn’t true.I’m advocating a kind of alteration of our imagined relationship to the planet. I think it’d be more fun – and also more sustainable. We’re always thinking that we’re much more powerful than we are, because we’re boosted by technological powers that exert a really, really high cost on the environment – a cost that isn’t calculated and that isn’t put into the price of things. It’s exteriorized from our fake economy. And it’s very profitable for certain elements in our society for us to continue to wander around in this dream-state and be upset about everything.The hope that, “Oh, if only civilization were to collapse, then I could be happy” – it’s ridiculous. You can simply walk out your front door and get what you want out of that particular fantasy.

(via BLDGBLOG)

    Comparative Planetology: An Interview with Kim Stanley Robinson

    BLDGBLOG: Aestheticizing these sorts of disasters can also have the effect of making climate change sound like an adventure. In Fifty Degrees Below, for instance, you wrote: “People are already fond of the flood… It was an adventure. It got people out of their ruts.” The implication is that people might actually be excited about climate change. Is there a risk that all these reports about flooded cities and lost archipelagoes and new coastlines might actually make climate change sound like some sort of survivalist adventure?

    Robinson: It’s a failure of imagination to think that climate change is going to be an escape from jail – and it’s a failure in a couple of ways.

    For one thing, modern civilization, with six billion people on the planet, lives on the tip of a gigantic complex of prosthetic devices – and all those devices have to work. The crash scenario that people think of, in this case, as an escape to freedom would actually be so damaging that it wouldn’t be fun. It wouldn’t be an adventure. It would merely be a struggle for food and security, and a permanent high risk of being robbed, beaten, or killed; your ability to feel confident about your own – and your family’s and your children’s – safety would be gone. People who fail to realize that… I’d say their imaginations haven’t fully gotten into this scenario.

    It’s easy to imagine people who are bored in the modern techno-surround, as I call it, and they’re bored because they have not fully comprehended that they’re still primates, that their brains grew over a million-year period doing a certain suite of activities, and those activities are still available. Anyone can do them; they’re simple. They have to do with basic life support and basic social activities unboosted by technological means.

    And there’s an addictive side to this. People try to do stupid technological replacements for natural primate actions, but it doesn’t quite give them the buzz that they hoped it would. Even though it looks quite magical, the sense of accomplishment is not there. So they do it again, hoping that the activity, like a drug, will somehow satisfy the urge that it’s supposedly meant to satisfy. But it doesn’t. So they do it more and more – and they fall down a rabbit hole, pursuing a destructive and high carbon-burn activity, when they could just go out for a walk, or plant a garden, or sit down at a table with a friend and drink some coffee and talk for an hour. All of these unboosted, straight-forward primate activities are actually intensely satisfying to the totality of the mind-body that we are.

    So a little bit of analysis of what we are as primates – how we got here evolutionarily, and what can satisfy us in this world – would help us to imagine activities that are much lower impact on the planet and much more satisfying to the individual at the same time. In general, I’ve been thinking: let’s rate our technologies for how much they help us as primates, rather than how they can put us further into this dream of being powerful gods who stalk around on a planet that doesn’t really matter to us.

    Because a lot of these supposed pleasures are really expensive. You pay with your life. You pay with your health. And they don’t satisfy you anyway! You end up taking various kinds of prescription or non-prescription drugs to compensate for your unhappiness and your unhealthiness – and the whole thing comes out of a kind of spiral: if only you could consume more, you’d be happier. But it isn’t true.

    I’m advocating a kind of alteration of our imagined relationship to the planet. I think it’d be more fun – and also more sustainable. We’re always thinking that we’re much more powerful than we are, because we’re boosted by technological powers that exert a really, really high cost on the environment – a cost that isn’t calculated and that isn’t put into the price of things. It’s exteriorized from our fake economy. And it’s very profitable for certain elements in our society for us to continue to wander around in this dream-state and be upset about everything.

    The hope that, “Oh, if only civilization were to collapse, then I could be happy” – it’s ridiculous. You can simply walk out your front door and get what you want out of that particular fantasy.

    (via BLDGBLOG)

  • July 8th
    335 notes
    Source
    scientificillustration:

Old World Marsupial Skulls by American Museum of Natural History on Flickr.
‘Freelance artist Patricia Wynne did 20 black-and-white plates of Old World marsupial skulls for Robin Beck, postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Mammalogy, to complement already published New World marsupial skulls she had done for Curator Rob Voss.’
scientificillustration:

Old World Marsupial Skulls by American Museum of Natural History on Flickr.
‘Freelance artist Patricia Wynne did 20 black-and-white plates of Old World marsupial skulls for Robin Beck, postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Mammalogy, to complement already published New World marsupial skulls she had done for Curator Rob Voss.’

    scientificillustration:

    Old World Marsupial Skulls by American Museum of Natural History on Flickr.

    ‘Freelance artist Patricia Wynne did 20 black-and-white plates of Old World marsupial skulls for Robin Beck, postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Mammalogy, to complement already published New World marsupial skulls she had done for Curator Rob Voss.’

  • July 3rd
    119 notes
    Source
    14-billion-years-later:

Why black holes emit radiation.The mathematical theory that black holes emit radiation has been something that has often bothered me. Surely if something can pull even light into it then how can it actually emit anything? The reason they do is because of a concept in quantum theory known as virtual particles. I’d have to say they’re one of my favorite ideas because they fill so many gaps in my understanding of the universe. Virtual particles are basically a pair of particles than pop in and out of existence in a very short amount of time. The idea is that two particles appear and then quickly interact, annihilating each other in the process. However say a pair of virtual particles come into existence on the event horizon of a black hole. There can be 3 general solutions, either both particles are pulled in, neither of the particles are pulled in (and promptly annihilate each other) or only one of the particles is pulled in. If only one of the pair is pulled into the black hole then the other somewhat ceases to be virtual and can escape the black hole as radiation.
14-billion-years-later:

Why black holes emit radiation.The mathematical theory that black holes emit radiation has been something that has often bothered me. Surely if something can pull even light into it then how can it actually emit anything? The reason they do is because of a concept in quantum theory known as virtual particles. I’d have to say they’re one of my favorite ideas because they fill so many gaps in my understanding of the universe. Virtual particles are basically a pair of particles than pop in and out of existence in a very short amount of time. The idea is that two particles appear and then quickly interact, annihilating each other in the process. However say a pair of virtual particles come into existence on the event horizon of a black hole. There can be 3 general solutions, either both particles are pulled in, neither of the particles are pulled in (and promptly annihilate each other) or only one of the particles is pulled in. If only one of the pair is pulled into the black hole then the other somewhat ceases to be virtual and can escape the black hole as radiation.

    14-billion-years-later:

    Why black holes emit radiation.

    The mathematical theory that black holes emit radiation has been something that has often bothered me. Surely if something can pull even light into it then how can it actually emit anything? The reason they do is because of a concept in quantum theory known as virtual particles. I’d have to say they’re one of my favorite ideas because they fill so many gaps in my understanding of the universe. Virtual particles are basically a pair of particles than pop in and out of existence in a very short amount of time. The idea is that two particles appear and then quickly interact, annihilating each other in the process. However say a pair of virtual particles come into existence on the event horizon of a black hole. There can be 3 general solutions, either both particles are pulled in, neither of the particles are pulled in (and promptly annihilate each other) or only one of the particles is pulled in. If only one of the pair is pulled into the black hole then the other somewhat ceases to be virtual and can escape the black hole as radiation.

  • July 3rd
    22 notes
    Source
    This seems a lot easier than having to re-grow your jawbone in your abdomen, but it’s really a question of scale.
sugaratoms:

 
There was a time when people who lost teeth as adults were simply out of luck. When we developed dentures and dental implants, the situation improved for those who are dentally deficient. But dentures are uncomfortable, and the procedure for installing dental implants is rather barbaric. Researchers at Columbia University Medical Center have devised a new method for regrowing missing teeth in adults – right in their own mouths.
The technique, developed by Dr. Jeffrey Mao, involves placing a tooth “scaffolding” made of natural materials in the patient’s mouth and directing stem cells to develop into a new, healthy tooth. By growing a real tooth right in the patient’s mouth, the patient’s healing time is greatly reduced when compared to that required after dental implants, and the chance of rejection by the patient’s body is almost eliminated
This seems a lot easier than having to re-grow your jawbone in your abdomen, but it’s really a question of scale.
sugaratoms:

 
There was a time when people who lost teeth as adults were simply out of luck. When we developed dentures and dental implants, the situation improved for those who are dentally deficient. But dentures are uncomfortable, and the procedure for installing dental implants is rather barbaric. Researchers at Columbia University Medical Center have devised a new method for regrowing missing teeth in adults – right in their own mouths.
The technique, developed by Dr. Jeffrey Mao, involves placing a tooth “scaffolding” made of natural materials in the patient’s mouth and directing stem cells to develop into a new, healthy tooth. By growing a real tooth right in the patient’s mouth, the patient’s healing time is greatly reduced when compared to that required after dental implants, and the chance of rejection by the patient’s body is almost eliminated

    This seems a lot easier than having to re-grow your jawbone in your abdomen, but it’s really a question of scale.

    sugaratoms:

    There was a time when people who lost teeth as adults were simply out of luck. When we developed dentures and dental implants, the situation improved for those who are dentally deficient. But dentures are uncomfortable, and the procedure for installing dental implants is rather barbaric. Researchers at Columbia University Medical Center have devised a new method for regrowing missing teeth in adults – right in their own mouths.

    The technique, developed by Dr. Jeffrey Mao, involves placing a tooth “scaffolding” made of natural materials in the patient’s mouth and directing stem cells to develop into a new, healthy tooth. By growing a real tooth right in the patient’s mouth, the patient’s healing time is greatly reduced when compared to that required after dental implants, and the chance of rejection by the patient’s body is almost eliminated

  • June 27th
    79 notes
    Source
    scientificillustration:

Brachiopods from the genus Spirifer
From: ‘An introduction to the study of the Brachiopoda intended as a handbook for the use of students’ By James Hall and John M. Clarke. Published 1894
scientificillustration:

Brachiopods from the genus Spirifer
From: ‘An introduction to the study of the Brachiopoda intended as a handbook for the use of students’ By James Hall and John M. Clarke. Published 1894

    scientificillustration:

    Brachiopods from the genus Spirifer

    From: ‘An introduction to the study of the Brachiopoda intended as a handbook for the use of students’ By James Hall and John M. Clarke. Published 1894

  • June 15th
    31 notes
    Source
    Oh, Texas. Never change, baby.
[quietly makes plans to move off-planet]
earthandthefinalfrontier:

Bill Nye Boo’d In Texas For Saying The Moon Reflects The Sun
Bill Nye, the harmless children’s edu-tainer known as “The Science Guy,”  managed to offend a select group of adults in Waco, Texas at a  presentation, when he suggested that the moon does not emit light, but  instead reflects the light of the sun. As even most elementary-school graduates know, the moon reflects the light of the sun but produces no light of its own. But don’t tell that to the good people of Waco, who were “visibly  angered by what some perceived as irreverence,” according to the Waco  Tribune. Nye was in town to participate in McLennan Community College’s  Distinguished Lecture Series. He gave two lectures on such unfunny and  adult topics as global warming, Mars exploration, and energy  consumption. But nothing got people as riled as when he brought up Genesis 1:16,  which reads: “God made two great lights — the greater light to govern  the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the  stars.” The lesser light, he pointed out, is not a light at all, but only a reflector. At this point, several people in the audience stormed out in fury. One  woman yelled “We believe in God!” and left with three children, thus  ensuring that people across America would read about the incident and  conclude that Waco is as nutty as they’d always suspected. This story originally appeared in the Waco Tribune, but the newspaper  has mysteriously pulled its story from the online version, presumably to  avoid further embarrassment.
Oh, Texas. Never change, baby.
[quietly makes plans to move off-planet]
earthandthefinalfrontier:

Bill Nye Boo’d In Texas For Saying The Moon Reflects The Sun
Bill Nye, the harmless children’s edu-tainer known as “The Science Guy,”  managed to offend a select group of adults in Waco, Texas at a  presentation, when he suggested that the moon does not emit light, but  instead reflects the light of the sun. As even most elementary-school graduates know, the moon reflects the light of the sun but produces no light of its own. But don’t tell that to the good people of Waco, who were “visibly  angered by what some perceived as irreverence,” according to the Waco  Tribune. Nye was in town to participate in McLennan Community College’s  Distinguished Lecture Series. He gave two lectures on such unfunny and  adult topics as global warming, Mars exploration, and energy  consumption. But nothing got people as riled as when he brought up Genesis 1:16,  which reads: “God made two great lights — the greater light to govern  the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the  stars.” The lesser light, he pointed out, is not a light at all, but only a reflector. At this point, several people in the audience stormed out in fury. One  woman yelled “We believe in God!” and left with three children, thus  ensuring that people across America would read about the incident and  conclude that Waco is as nutty as they’d always suspected. This story originally appeared in the Waco Tribune, but the newspaper  has mysteriously pulled its story from the online version, presumably to  avoid further embarrassment.

    Oh, Texas. Never change, baby.

    [quietly makes plans to move off-planet]

    earthandthefinalfrontier:

    Bill Nye Boo’d In Texas For Saying The Moon Reflects The Sun

    Bill Nye, the harmless children’s edu-tainer known as “The Science Guy,” managed to offend a select group of adults in Waco, Texas at a presentation, when he suggested that the moon does not emit light, but instead reflects the light of the sun.

    As even most elementary-school graduates know, the moon reflects the light of the sun but produces no light of its own.

    But don’t tell that to the good people of Waco, who were “visibly angered by what some perceived as irreverence,” according to the Waco Tribune.

    Nye was in town to participate in McLennan Community College’s Distinguished Lecture Series. He gave two lectures on such unfunny and adult topics as global warming, Mars exploration, and energy consumption.

    But nothing got people as riled as when he brought up Genesis 1:16, which reads: “God made two great lights — the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars.”

    The lesser light, he pointed out, is not a light at all, but only a reflector.

    At this point, several people in the audience stormed out in fury. One woman yelled “We believe in God!” and left with three children, thus ensuring that people across America would read about the incident and conclude that Waco is as nutty as they’d always suspected.

    This story originally appeared in the Waco Tribune, but the newspaper has mysteriously pulled its story from the online version, presumably to avoid further embarrassment.

  • May 23rd
    193 notes
    Source
    matthen:

I would call it The Plough, you might know it as The Big Dipper- or even The Celestial Bureaucrat. It’s a particularly helpful constellation for navigation, as it can help us folk in the northern hemisphere find Polaris, the North Star. Everyday it moves in the sky due to the spinning of the Earth, but on much longer time scales it is doing something a lot more amazing. To our very earliest ancestors, it would have looked quite different- as all the stars in our Galaxy are moving- in general spinning around the galactic spiral’s centre. A good reminder that the Universe is really a very dynamic place. [more]
matthen:

I would call it The Plough, you might know it as The Big Dipper- or even The Celestial Bureaucrat. It’s a particularly helpful constellation for navigation, as it can help us folk in the northern hemisphere find Polaris, the North Star. Everyday it moves in the sky due to the spinning of the Earth, but on much longer time scales it is doing something a lot more amazing. To our very earliest ancestors, it would have looked quite different- as all the stars in our Galaxy are moving- in general spinning around the galactic spiral’s centre. A good reminder that the Universe is really a very dynamic place. [more]

    matthen:

    I would call it The Plough, you might know it as The Big Dipper- or even The Celestial Bureaucrat. It’s a particularly helpful constellation for navigation, as it can help us folk in the northern hemisphere find Polaris, the North Star. Everyday it moves in the sky due to the spinning of the Earth, but on much longer time scales it is doing something a lot more amazing. To our very earliest ancestors, it would have looked quite different- as all the stars in our Galaxy are moving- in general spinning around the galactic spiral’s centre. A good reminder that the Universe is really a very dynamic place. [more]

    (via physicsphysics)

  • May 21st
    12 notes
    Source
    "As nuclei go, it may be pretty famous, but it’s famous because it’s anomalous… it lives too long."
    Why carbon-14 is like an old woman (via outofcontextscience)
  • January 31st
    ZOMGscience.net
Not just a funny website about science, this is possibly the funniest fucking website concerning science I’ve ever read. ZOMGscience.net
Not just a funny website about science, this is possibly the funniest fucking website concerning science I’ve ever read.

    ZOMGscience.net

    Not just a funny website about science, this is possibly the funniest fucking website concerning science I’ve ever read.

1 2 3 4 5 Next Last Page
RSS Archive
Queries
Most recently updated subscriptions
  • scientificillustration
  • laughingsquid
  • fuckyeahexistentialism
  • crookedindifference
  • kellyoxford
  • skiparound
  • thedailywhat
  • nevver
  • baturday
  • newsweek
  • scienceisbeauty
  • monstermadeofeyes
  • drawnblog
  • shesaw0lf
  • ragbag
  • fuckyeahsciencefiction
  • acepilots
  • comicbookcovers
  • totallygroovy
  • beaguedes
  • leadingtone
  • rustybreak
  • wearethe99percent
  • dcwomenkickingass
  • infinityparade
  • freshphotons
  • vortexanomaly
  • 14-billion-years-later
  • throwtolion
  • koolikeplastiic
  • bonjourmadame
  • heller
  • uuiuu
  • ladymeng
  • sovietlove
  • timetravelswithoutamachine
  • fuckyoudraculas
  • lacontessa
  • fuckyeahmath
  • earthandthefinalfrontier
  • mariposima
  • comicsalliance
  • sugaratoms
  • doctorwho
  • whisperoftheshot
  • meganmcisaac
  • section5
  • youranonnews
  • fuckyeahnebulas
  • solarflares
  • ririsilki
  • pressipiss
  • dearcoquette
  • moviesinframes
  • jeffkooons
  • ghostattack
  • yomamallama
  • bookshelfporn
  • radio23
  • towerofsleep
  • desjardins
  • coketalk
  • julienfoulatier
  • science
  • eirizu
  • nerdology
  • carlovely
  • tesslynch
  • differentkicks
  • warrenellis
  • bitcoinnews
  • fuckyeahbats
  • jsmooth995
  • rarebasedswag
  • alliedslump
  • brownpau
  • proofmathisbeautiful
  • duded
  • greggskloff
  • bowiesongs
  • hatethefuture
  • fuckyeahquantummechanics
  • jaynawallace
  • engineeringisawesome
  • garfieldminusgarfield
  • adsertoris
  • magneticsympathy
  • fantagor
  • missing-e
  • marnelucas
  • tentacular
  • wondertonic
  • byebyebutts
  • xn--c1h
  • lazybookreviews
  • xplanes
  • liana
  • uggly
  • momentofmoore
  • jonathanhaggard
  • bookshelves
  • alexbalk
  • bourbonthret
  • super-villian
  • steelweaver
  • wordbirds
  • longhair
  • bayanjargal
  • phobos-romulus
  • drzzl
  • eilagamphotoincubator
  • spacerules
  • apteryxrowi
  • splitstringregex
  • philnoto
  • momentry
  • physicsphysics
  • freedolphinrides
  • evilmadlinks
  • yomdcraps
  • pixelfucks
  • theairtightgarage
  • spidermanspiderman
  • iwdrm
  • sigmundhenry
  • skyofthemind
  • ksouth
  • thebonemachine
  • outofcontextscience
  • quantumaniac
  • unalaska
  • plussedejuliedoucet
  • otomblr
  • fuckyeahnervoussystem
  • thisworldwemustleave
  • comicallyvintage
  • blending
  • runningdive
  • onminimalism
  • craftyacademy
  • danielwalsh
  • tomorrowtales
  • oblivion-continuum
  • santapau
  • thestrathconaartgallery
  • diasporg
  • fuckyeahdioramas
  • alrightmamadude
  • xtc
  • pismoblog
  • peoplewilldownload
  • albumtacos
  • harkavagrantfeed
  • powercomics
  • nerdsruineverything
  • fydomes
  • perennial-dissonance
  • fuckyeahphysics
  • salvaged
  • sheslostcontrol-again
  • obis
  • fractalart
  • redofromstart
  • gh0sting
  • bobjones
  • buttcoin
  • gifwatcher
  • noisesmith
  • rovingmusicologist
  • wreellife
  • mindlessmadscientists
  • pcmuze
  • kathyack
  • photogmac
  • mercenarywriters
  • barrymaurices